January 2010
Bubbles and Reform: the Delicate Balance PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 15 January 2010 05:15
We've posted a lot about this lately, but it's clear that the subject of bubbles isn't going away any time soon. Just this week The World Economic Forum released its annual report, Global Risks 2010. The report makes some stunning predictions saying that there is more than a one-in-five chance that another asset price bubble is looming on the horizon.  And when it bursts it could be as devastating to the world's economies as the last one and become one gigantic tsunami of a financial crisis.

Not a rosy picture, but let's push back for a moment and focus on the nearly four-in-five chance that it won't happen.  We prefer those odds, even though finding a workable solution to our current financial crisis appears to be a slow-moving long shot.

In the US, we're witnessing a delicate balancing act—or should we say, a tug of war—as economists and lawmakers weigh the pros and cons of keeping interest rates low to help a stumbling economy, but avoiding runaway inflation, while simultaneously eyeing the possibility of inviting a situation that could become the next asset bubble.

Some argue that the potential bubble problem lies in the record low interest rates held fast by the Fed for the past 12 months.  With cheaper money, it could become too tempting for speculators to rush back in and snap up everything that appears to glitter—never mind that they might not understand what they're doing.  It's that kind of irresponsible exuberance that pushes asset prices to unsustainable levels . . . and we all know how that ends.

Now, please don't misunderstand us.  We're all for intelligent speculating.  Our book, The Big Gamble: Are You Investing or Speculating? makes our position pretty clear. As we point out, it's the speculators and the well reasoned and seasoned risk takers that have always sparked the imagination and fueled innovation and job creation for many.
Read more...
 
A New Decade: Time for New Decisions PDF Print E-mail
  
Friday, 01 January 2010 02:20

We're entering a new year and leaving behind a decade in which your so-called investments took a brutal beating. As we point out in our book The Big Gamble, while you may have believed that you were investing your money, clearly the results have proven that you were only speculating.  So many people gambled and lost, some economists are calling the 90s the "lost decade" for stocks.

 

The S&P 500 average is lower than a decade ago. Dividend yields may have brought some of the more fortunate closer to a break-even point, (the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund lists the average annual returns of 0.18% for the ten years through the end of November), but we all took a hit with inflation registering a couple of percentage points per year.

 

Maybe we're viewing this through 20/20 hindsight, but these losses should not have been a great surprise considering that stock valuations were at an unsustainable and historical peak at the beginning of the 90s.  It was fertile ground for herd mentality to trump rational thought—everyone was buying into the notion that stocks were the best long-term investment because the meme was that over any given thirty-year period stocks do better than any other asset class. 

 

That kind of thinking works when there's a guarantee that the future will always be like the past . . . which is to say, never.  Besides, when everyone believes that ABC stock is the best long-term investment on the market, consider that a red flag.  What happens when demand is high? The price gets higher. And when you get enough people to agree on the same investment strategy, odds are good that they're wrong.

 

So, we've all learned a hard lesson from recent experience.  But is this the time to believe that the worst is over or that it's time to throw caution to the wind and forge ahead? Or is it time to be extra cautious now that we're already hearing New Year predictions of good things to come and theories about why it's time to get into the market.

 

Some of those prognosticators will rationalize that the near future will be a good time for stocks because there will be a capital shortage from every source except the stock market.  In their view, the stock market will be the only game in town. Why? They reason that during the past decade, corporations have had ready access to cash from banks, the bond markets or private-equity companies, so they weren't focused on trying to make shareholders happy.

Read more...
 


Login ::Register FREE::

Register Now For FREE
and receive 12 Keys to Smart Speculating in Tough Times!

What's Your Take?

What effect will electing Mr. Obama have on the global recession?
 


Finance blogs